€œGovernment servant should comply wily with those orders/directions of his superior which were legal and within his competence-Compliance of illegal or an incompetent direction/order could neither be justified on the plea of same having been issued from superior authority nor same could be defended on Uri ground that non-compliance thereof, could have exposed concerned Government servant to the risk of disciplinary action-Role of bureaucracy in the administrative set-up highlighted. €œZahid Akhtar Vs Govt: of Punjab through Secretary, Local Government and Rural Development, Lahore and 2 others†reported as (PLD 1995 SC 530) while commenting upon the conduct and attitude of the Government servants observed: The august Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Such practice has eroded the public confidence on the selection process and it has become a general perception that the appointments in the departments are not made on merit but either on the direction of the political figures or some influential in the department. It is very unfortunate state of affairs that we have noted and observed in many cases that the appointments to public posts are not made in a transparent manner. 5407-P of 2019 Safdar Khan Vs Govt of KP through Chief Secretary Requirement of law that not only the plaintiff will prove the execution of agreement but also the payment of sale consideration, in case of failure the plaintiff cannot be held entitled for decree, either for specific performance or in alternate for recovery of amount allegedly paid. Suit for Specific Performance of agreement. (ii) Person selected for the service in an earlier selection shall rank senior to the person selected in a later selection.ĬR No.102-B of 2021 Sami Ullah Vs Rehmat Ullah
(i) Service appeal not maintainable against provisional Seniority list. 06-P of 2021 Kalim Arshad Khan Vs Peshawar High Court Peshawar through Registrar
0 kommentar(er)
